The latest American bombardment in the South American nation and the capture of its president have sparked unease regarding Washington's designs on the Arctic territory. Members of the ex-president's base have allegedly set their sights on the strategically important landmass in the wake of the events in the southern hemisphere.
Merely hours following the start of the Venezuelan campaign, a prominent right-wing commentator, who is the spouse of a senior presidential adviser, posted a symbolic image. The graphic depicted Greenland covered in the stars and stripes, with the single-word caption: "COMING."
This overt threat to absorb the resource-abundant region, which is a member of the NATO alliance, triggered immediate and firm criticism from Denmark's officials.
"We are strong partners and should continue to work together as such. American security is equally the Arctic's and Denmark’s security," stated the Copenhagen's envoy to the United States. "Our nation and the United States work together to ensure security in the North."
The diplomat additionally highlighted that the kingdom had substantially boosted its defence spending recently, earmarking a substantial amount specifically for Arctic and regional security. "And yes, we demand complete recognition for the sovereign borders of the our realm," he added.
The situation were additionally exacerbated by the recent naming of a Southern governor as a special envoy to Greenland. The appointee had openly thanked the commander-in-chief, saying it was an "honour" to work in a unpaid capacity to "make Greenland a part of the US."
After the events in Venezuela, this representative praised the president's decisive move, connecting it to the wider "war on drugs."
Since returning to office, the US president has consistently unnerved transatlantic allies with his stated desire in Greenland. The island is viewed as vitally important for defence and future mineral exploitation. It currently houses the most northerly US air base.
In a notable television interview, the leader declined to exclude the use of military force to acquire Greenland. This position comes amid growing global competition in the Arctic. "I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going to do it, but I don't rule out anything... We need Greenland very badly," he remarked.
He described Greenland as having a "tiny amount of people, which we’ll look after, and we’ll value them... But we need that for global security."
In reaction to this persistent "drumbeat" of threats, Danish security agency took the unprecedented step last month of labelling the United States as a "security risk."
The prime ministers of Denmark and Greenland delivered a unified and forceful statement: "We have said it very clearly before. Now we say it again... You cannot annex other countries."
Public opinion in Greenland shows a nuanced picture. While a vast majority of the territory's residents desire self-rule from Copenhagen, there is also little to no appetite to join the United States. The island has had the legal right to declare independence for many years.
Military analysts are now re-evaluating the likelihood of such a action. One thinktank analyst specializing in defence admitted she had previously discounted the rhetoric but was "currently not so sure."
"Logistically, it would be feasible for the US to station a few hundred or a couple thousand troops inside of Greenland, and it's unclear to me who could do anything about it," she observed.
A passionate film critic with over a decade of experience, specializing in indie and international cinema.